Relationship between managerial ownership, dividend, and leverage financing.

 


For the development of a country's economy and the standard of living, growth is needed and has a significant role in changing it. Many of the studies stated that, and provide different evidence related to the growth and development of the economy, through which the economic goal can be easily, achieved the high level of growth and development provides chances to different parents in countries where they educate his and her child. which lead the economy through developing a new generation as an entrepreneur and thus a new way is started from the past growth action into a new growth action and also establishing a good governance system with the new technologies, in reaction Economic growth and development is promoted. But under diverse circumstances, comparable rates of development can have actual diverse things on poverty (Kibet & Jagongo, 2016) (Tuigong Wilson Kibet, 2016). In the corporation business field, the competition between different organizations are increasing day by day. Every organization is struggling to stay in competition and survive with a strong competitive position. For this reason, it is very important that corporations implement good strategies and planning and also needed to manage resources optimally. Among the bundle of resources one of them is the capital and capital structure. It means that how the organization combines use the capital and debt to get high return in the market. The capital structure is one of the most difficult and risky decision for organization because there is high risk involve with it. If the combinations work it give high return but in the situation of failure the result is opposite. In the success and high performance of the organization the capital structure playing a significant role, the optimal structure of capital give and maximizing the return of the organization which give extra edge for firm in the rivalry market of different organization (Abor, 2005). Risk charming is predictable for managers in order to shun key pressure to the organization (Jensen  Meckling, 1976).

According to Jensen, M (1976), conducted study on Corporate governance from which they argue that corporate governance is working as a controlling instruments, which means through these owners can control the management team and board of directors that either they are working for owner’s wealth or they are working for something else. The first aim of the selected governance (Management & Directors) is to maximize the wealth of owners’. As per Vishney, S. (1997) stated that for the protection of the owners return and other stakeholder’s parties of the corporation corporate governance play significant role to protect it. The most important announcement for investors and organization is the dividend announcement, it is considered the most vital portion of the events and almost all of the previous research give focus to it.  The reflection of the previous works on the stock market is stated that the market is Semi-strong form of efficient market hypothesis (EMH). It stated that this form of market information about the stock price is included the overall publicly available information immediately and accurately (Gupta, 2010).

According to the firm of Asian development they state that the corporate governance is the power through which the resources is managed of different countries, it is a tactical way for of management. (Wescott, 2000) state that the corporate governance creates and establish rules and regulation, codes creating structures and procedures, also controlling techniques for the management of firms. The main goal of Corporate Governance is to protect the stakeholders benefit. As per the state of (Nielsen, 2000) that the Problem of Agency theory and for the reduction of cost of organization will be reduce through the corporate governance, because it is like an instrument for reduction of these problems. Manager incurred different other type of cost for their own benefit because manager is trying to increase and work for their own benefits instead of working for shareholders and owner benefits. (Kidd and Richter, 2003). According to the study result of Eisenbeis et al. (1999) examined the US firms’ profitability by using the method of different techniques. They conclude from this work that both of the techniques give very useful Profitability information, and also it indicates for the management who have the control of taking decision that place and use more weight in the method of SFA estimation. Chu and Lim (1998) use the DEA method for the Singapore firming study. The Sufian and Majid (2006) also implement the DEA technique for the listed firms of the Malaysian for the period of 2002-2003. Pasiouras et al. (2007) conduct study on 10 Greece firms, they examined the ASE listed firms. The result show that there is positive association between the changes and the Profitability, and also find out that there also effect on the return of stock. But on the other aspect that changing in Profitability have no effect on the return of stock price (Hongmei Gu & Jiahui Yue, 2011).

Variables

MGO

LEV

DIVR

 

LIQ

 

GRO

 

ROA

 

TANG

 

SIZE

 

 

 

 

Conclusion

Corporate governance creates and establish rules and regulation, codes creating structures and procedures, also controlling techniques for the management of firms. The main goal of Corporate Governance is to protect the stakeholder’s benefit. the Problem of Agency theory and for the reduction of cost of organization reduce through the corporate governance, because it is like an instrument for reduction of these problems. Manager incurred different other type of cost for their own benefit because manager is trying to increase and work for their own benefits instead of working for shareholders and owner benefits. Corporate governance is the system of balancing and checking of different resources. The objective of corporate governance is to monitor and controlling the activities of management in organization. The combination of different directors known as the size of board. The size of boards is different from country to country, firm to firm due to its different culture, different type of rules and regulation and also the type of ownership structure. As per the study of Macit (2011), they used the ROA and ROE factors to determine the profitability of firm, and also focused to evaluate specific factors. The conducted on the turkey firms. Due to different geographical location, some of the work analyze different issues and problem related to the Profitability of firming system like the estimations from diverse methods.